Author: admin

Custody of Children/Guardianship/Visitation RightsSr. No.Title Citation Question involved Held 1 Beata Agnieszka Sobieraj Versus State of Himachal PradeshCriminal Appeal No. 787 of 2016 DOD : 22.08.2016 (SC)Custody of Child to independent authority ∙ Whether it is permissible to Hand over child custody to an Institution ignoring parent’s claim. ∙ Held – while depreciating the practice of handing over the custody of the child to an institution, by ignoring the claim of a parent, especially the mother of the child, as not acceptable, ∙ Held- the handing over of custody of child to an Institution, while ignoring the claim of a parent, especially the mother of the child, is not acceptable.”2 Bimla and others Vs Anita 2015(3) RCR (Civil) 153 (SC)Custody…

For Private Circulation : Educational Purpose Only AA vk uks Hkæk% Øroks ;Urq fo’or% AA “Let noble thoughts come to us from every side.” RIG VEDA COMPILATION OF LANDMARK JUDGMENTS OF HIGH COURTS OF INDIA ON FAMILY MATTERS When centuries old obstructions are removed, age old shackles are either burnt or lost their force, the chains get rusted, and the human endowments and virtues are not indifferently treated and emphasis is laid on “free identity” and not on “annexed identity”, and the women of today can gracefully and boldly assert their legal rights and refuse to be tied down to…

2024 INSC 324 Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed by SONIA BHASIN Date: 2024.04.19 17:58:33 IST Reason: Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. OF 2024 (Special Leave to Petition (Crl.) No.2520 OF 2017) PARTEEK BANSAL …APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. …RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N T VIKRAM NATH, J. Leave granted. 2. This appeal assails the correctness of the judgement and order dated 06.03.2017 passed by the Rajasthan High Court in S.B. Criminal Misc. (Pet.) No. 3259 of 2015 dismissing the said petition filed under Section 482 of the…

CWP-1827-2019 -1-  236 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-1827-2019 Date of Decision: 31.10.2022 Mandeep Kaur …… Petitioner Versus Canara Bank and another ……… Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJBIR SEHRAWAT Present : Mr. Birender Singh Rana, Senior Advocate, with Mr.Amit Khatkar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rakesh Gupta, Advocate, for the respondents. ***** RAJBIR SEHRAWAT, J. (ORAL) This is a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 10.04.2018 (Annexure P-8) and order/communication dated 17.10.2018 (Annexure P-10), whereby offer of…

Neutral Citation No. – 2024:AHC:121366 Court No. – 74 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. – 1084 of 2020 Applicant :- Bhanu Prakash Verma And 3 Ors Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr Counsel for Applicant :- Firoz Haider Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Jitendra Kumar Ravat,Kamal Singh Hon’ble Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J. 1. At the outset, Sri Firoz Haider, learned counsel for the applicants, submits that during the pendency of this application, applicant no. 3, Smt. Munni Devi, wife of Shivram Verma has expired. As such, application arising out of Case No. 323 of 2019 (State v. Bhanu…

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 195 OF 2022 (arising out of S.L.P (Crl.) No. 6545 OF 2020) KAHKASHAN KAUSAR @ SONAM & ORS. … APPELLANT (S) VERSUS STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. … RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT KRISHNA MURARI, J. Leave granted. 2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13.11.2019 passed by the High Court of Patna in Criminal Writ Petition No. 1492 of 2019, filed by the Appellants under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as ‘CrPC’) challenging the FIR No. 248/2019 dated 01.04.2019…

SCC Online Web Edition, © 2025 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd. Page 1 Saturday, August 30, 2025 Printed For: Anand Vardhan Shrivastava SCC Online Web Edition: https://www.scconline.com © 2025 EBC Publishing Pvt. Ltd., Lucknow. ———————————————————————————————————————————————————– 2024 SCC OnLine P&H 12480 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh (BEFORE HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J.) Surinder Singh … Appellant; Versus State of Punjab and Others … Respondents. CRA-S-2546-2023 (O&M) Decided on July 23, 2024, [Reserved on: 22.07.2024] Advocate who appeared in this case : Mr. Dhiraj Chawla, Advocate and Mr. Akshit Dhiman, Advocate for the appellant. The Judgment of the Court…

Jagdish Prasad vs State & Ors on 22 February, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 10 CRL.M.C. 1130/2008 & CRL.M.A.4231/2008 JAGDISH PRASAD ….. Petitioner Through: Mr.R.B. Pandey, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS. ….. Respondents Through: Mr.Jaideep Malik,APP. Mr. R.P. Kaushik, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes ORDER 23.03.2009 1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of…

Neutral Citation No. – 2023:AHC:238266 Court No. – 79 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. – 3760 of 2023 Revisionist :- Amit Bajpai Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Chandra Bhushan Yadav Hon’ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J. Heard Sri Sarvesh Kumar Dubey, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Chandra Bhusan Yadav, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. This criminal revision has been filed by the revisionist against the judgement and order dated 14.06.2023 passed by Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Court…

Jagdish Prasad vs State & Ors on 22 February, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 10 CRL.M.C. 1130/2008 & CRL.M.A.4231/2008 JAGDISH PRASAD ….. Petitioner Through: Mr.R.B. Pandey, Advocate. versus STATE & ORS. ….. Respondents Through: Mr.Jaideep Malik,APP. Mr. R.P. Kaushik, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR 1. Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? No 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? Yes 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in Digest? Yes ORDER 23.03.2009 1. This petition under Section 482 of the Code of…